Things HR Is Tired of Hearing: A Reality Check from The HR Carousel

If you've worked in HR long enough, you've probably heard these lines more times than you can count.
Some are funny. Some are frustrating. And some make you wonder if people know what HR actually does.
Let's clear the air.
"Wala namang ginagawa ang HR."
Kala n'yo lang.
Most HR work happens behind the scenes—recruitment, employee relations, labor law compliance, disciplinary processes, investigations, compensation and benefits coordination, policy implementation, documentation, and conflict resolution.
When everything runs smoothly, people assume HR isn't doing anything.
Ironically, that's often a sign that HR is doing its job well. Problems are addressed before they escalate, employees get the support they need, and the business can continue operating without every people-related concern turning into a full-blown crisis.
Of course, not everything HR does is invisible. Sometimes, people only notice us when something goes wrong.
And when that happens, suddenly, everybody knows where to find HR.

"HR puro tsismis."
Let's be honest. Meron din namang Marites sa HR. Sorry na! 😂 We're human, too.
But that doesn't mean the entire HR profession deserves the reputation.
HR handles confidential information daily. The real challenge isn't learning sensitive information—it's knowing what must remain confidential and having the discipline to keep it that way.
Years ago, I applied to a company that had a notice posted saying, "HR is A Tsismis Free Zone." True story.
Apparently, someone understood that even HR needs a reminder.
All I'm saying is that the majority of us would rather zip our mouths than risk our professionalism, our credibility, and the trust people place in us.
And if we earned money from every secret we knew, many of us would have retired early. 😂
Seriously, confidentiality is not optional. Knowing something doesn't automatically give us permission to share it. There are boundaries, and professional HR practitioners are expected to respect them.
So yes, there may be a Marites in HR. But please don't judge the entire profession by the occasional office gossip.
Some of us know things we will take to our graves—and we're perfectly fine with that.
"Saan napupunta ang deduction sa tardiness?"
Certainly not to HR.
I once had an annoyed manager confront me about where the tardiness deductions went—as if I were pocketing the money. I handle payroll, guys. Apparently, that made me the most convenient person to interrogate.
No, we don't earn a commission every time someone is late.
And if I'm late, my own attendance is subject to the applicable company rules, too. Walang special treatment just because I work in HR.
Payroll deductions must be handled in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and company policies. HR doesn't get a bonus because someone arrived late.
We process the numbers. We don't magically turn attendance deductions into our personal allowance.
"HR should always be approachable and a people pleaser."
Approachable? Absolutely.
People pleaser? Not necessarily.
HR is expected to be fair, objective, and professional. Sometimes that means saying "no," enforcing policies, or reminding everyone that due process exists for a reason.
We can listen to an employee's concerns without automatically agreeing with every demand. We can empathize with a manager without endorsing every decision. And we can be respectful without compromising fairness.
Our goal is to do what's right—not to win a popularity contest.
Because if HR's primary objective were to make everybody happy, we would have a very difficult time doing our actual jobs.
"Employees are replaceable."
Positions can be filled. People cannot be replicated.
A replacement can occupy the same seat, but experience, institutional knowledge, trusted relationships, and years of contribution are not instantly transferable.
Someone may know the systems, understand the unwritten processes, remember why certain decisions were made, or have earned the trust of colleagues and clients over many years.
You can hire someone to fill the vacancy. You cannot expect that person to reproduce everything the previous employee brought to the organization overnight.
Replacing a headcount is easy. Replacing impact is another story.
This doesn't mean an organization can never move on from an employee. Businesses change, roles evolve, and sometimes separations are necessary.
But treating people as if they were interchangeable parts overlooks the value they contribute—and the cost of losing that value.
"Madali lang naman ang trabaho sa HR."
Tell that to anyone who has handled employee grievances, labor compliance, workplace investigations, difficult conversations, or organizational change.
In one day, we might juggle payroll, timekeeping, damage control, bullied employees who need someone to listen, employees crying in the office, and managers asking how to discipline an employee who also happens to be a close friend.
The manager doesn't want to permanently unfriend the employee. So, who gets to have the uncomfortable conversation? HR, of course. We take care of that little complication for them.
Then there's the employee who wants an immediate answer, the manager who needs a policy explained for the third time, the payroll concern that cannot wait, and the compliance deadline that will not move just because everyone's busy.
Sometimes, we're expected to resolve a problem without the authority to make the final decision. Other times, we're asked to implement a decision we didn't make but must still explain to the people affected by it.
And somehow, we are expected to remain calm, objective, approachable, and professional throughout it all.
That's HR.
Managing people is rarely simple. The work becomes even more challenging when expectations are unclear, decisions keep changing, or everyone assumes that HR can fix everything.
We can help manage the situation. We cannot perform miracles.
"Skills can be taught. Attitude can't."
Reality is more nuanced.
Technical skills can take months or years to develop. Attitudes and behaviors can also change through coaching, self-awareness, experience, and a genuine willingness to improve.
We shouldn't automatically write people off simply because they have something to learn or an area they need to work on.
An employee may lack experience but demonstrate curiosity, accountability, and a willingness to learn. Another may be technically competent but struggle with collaboration, feedback, or accepting responsibility. Both situations deserve to be assessed fairly.
Of course, coaching only works when the person is willing to participate. HR and managers can provide guidance, set expectations, and create opportunities for improvement, but they cannot do the growing for someone else.
Growth is possible. Whether someone is willing to do the work is another matter.
"HR should be available 24/7."
Need an employment certificate on a Sunday?
Payroll question at 11:00 p.m.?
Leave balance inquiry during a holiday?
Employee need assistance in their medical issue at 4:30 p.m. and the ER staff cannot reach your HMO provider?
Somehow, the expectation is that HR should always be online.
And if we don't respond immediately, someone might wonder why HR is ignoring them.
The truth is, HR professionals are employees, too. We have families, responsibilities, errands, appointments, and lives outside work.
Not every concern is an emergency. Not every message requires an immediate response. And not every administrative request needs to be processed the moment someone thinks of it.
Of course, genuine emergencies and business-critical situations may require an appropriate response outside regular working hours. But that is different from treating HR as a permanently available help desk.
Being committed to the job does not mean being permanently on call.
Discussions and legislative proposals in the Philippines have also raised the issue of employees' right to disconnect from work-related communications outside working hours. Whatever the eventual legal framework, it is worth asking whether our workplace practices respect reasonable boundaries.
HR can help establish those boundaries, too. We shouldn't have to exempt ourselves from the very principles of employee well-being that we encourage organizations to adopt.
HR deserves personal time, too.
Final Thoughts
HR isn't perfect, and constructive criticism is part of the profession. We make mistakes, and we should be accountable for them. Employees have every right to raise legitimate concerns, question decisions, and expect fair treatment.
But we're not miracle workers.
We're not mind readers.
We're not the office rumor mill.
And we're definitely not collecting your tardiness deductions.
Behind every policy, investigation, interview, payroll concern, or employee issue is an HR professional trying to balance business realities, legal compliance, fairness, and humanity.
It's not always visible.
But that doesn't mean it isn't happening.
About Me:
I'm Joseline M. Alosbaños, a Philippine-based HR practitioner and consultant, known here as the HR Carousel Ringmistress.
With over 25 years of experience across corporate HR, consulting, and freelance work, I've seen HR from different angles—from the day-to-day realities of employee relations and recruitment to payroll, policies, compliance, and the many challenges of managing people at work.
HR isn't always neat, straightforward, or textbook-perfect. Sometimes, it means finding practical solutions to complicated situations, balancing employee concerns with business needs, and knowing when to step in—and when to stay in your lane.
Through HR Carousel, I share insights, lessons from practice, and a few observations about the wonderfully complicated world of HR. My goal is simple: to make HR discussions more practical, relatable, and useful to fellow practitioners and anyone interested in the workplace.
For HR consulting or professional inquiries, you can reach me at joyce.alosbanos@gmail.com.






Comments